Keeping the Ladbroke area special​

Events and announcements

The only forthcoming event is the 2022 (53rd) Annual general meeting, on which see below.

The minutes of the 2021 are below. For minutes of previous meetings, click on

Minutes of past annual general meetings


The Society’s annual general meeting is normally held in the summer.  All members are invited. The AGM provides a forum for members to express their views and to question thecommittee – although we also welcome views by letter or email at


The next annual general meeting will be on 19 July at 6.30 for 7 pm. It will be at St Peter’s Church in Kensington Park Road. All are welcome.

 The agenda is:

1. Minutes of last meeting

2. Matters arising from the minutes

3. Chairman’s report

4. Treasurer’s report and adoption of the accounts

5. Election of officers

6. Election of Committee

7. Any other business.

Nominations for officers and committee members, proposed and seconded, should reach the Hon Sec at 19 Stanley Gardens, W11 2NG, before the meeting.





Minutes of the 52nd Annual General Meeting

held on the 17th November 2021

      at St Peter’s Church,  Kensington Park Road

1. Minutes of the Last Meeting

The Minutes of the last meeting were approved


2. Matters Arising from the Minutes

There were no matters arising from the minutes

3. Chairman’s Report       

The Chairman welcomed everyone to the meeting and reported that for the first part of the year the Committee had done its business by email.  Each week one of our four architects would look at the planning applications and give their recommendations.   In the summer, however, we resumed meeting, wherever possible in the garden of a committee member (we were only rained off once).

As usual our main work had been to look at all the planning applications in the area. Most of them were simple things requiring no comment, but there were quite a few where we lodged objections.   Many of these involved rear elevations giving onto communal gardens where the applicants wanted to add often quite unsuitable extensions – in gardens and on roofs.  The importance here was not just the view from the communal garden, but also light pollution from rear extensions with big windows. We found it sad that no sooner has someone purchased an historic house than they wish to enlarge or extend it, often obliterating the characteristics that made the property and its surroundings special. One problem had been that during the pandemic planning officers giving pre-application advice had been unable to make site visits and sometimes deemed proposals acceptable that they might not have done if they had seen the site. Once pre-app advice had been given,the officers were pretty well bound to support that advice.

  The noise of increased outside living with the pandemic was yet another form of pollution that had attracted concerns. Patio heaters, fire pits and external fireplaces were also potentially polluting or energy-wasting.

This year had also seen important consultations.  The Council had consulted on  a Supplementary Policy Document on “greening”. This was not a very helpful document as it is chiefly about big new-build schemes and not relevant to our Victorian houses.  We did succeed however in persuading the Council to issue a separate householder guide which is much more helpful.

Households are being encouraged to replace their gas boilers but the installation of heat pumps as an alternative is expensive, very difficult to install in a built-up area such as the Ladbroke Estate and not very effective without really excellent insulation. It was likely to be some years, therefore, before we saw the back of gas boilers.


Questions were addressed to the Chairman on the following subjects:

  • Light pollution and the environment
  • Subterranean developments and their effect on neighbours.
  • Flooding
  • Air Conditioning, double glazing and solar panels
  • Parking spaces and electric cars and charging points

The Chairman detailed action taken by the Association or otherwise explained the views of the Association.


4. Treasurer’s Report and Adoption of Accounts

The Treasurer circulated the accounts to the meeting and presented a report on the main items of income and expenditure.  It was to be noted that the Association claimed Gift Aid on a two yearly basis, so that was a lumpy item in the accounts.  The subscription remained at £15 and we had attracted a number of new members during the year. However, there were also a number of members leaving the area or dying so membership remained fairly constant.  Our reserves remain substantial which is considered prudent as we may have to seek some legal or specialist advice at any time.  We had spent some money on revamping our website and also donated £2,500 to St Peter’s Church for clock repairs.


5. Election of Officers and Committee

Sophia Lambert was elected as Chairman in 2019 for a period of three years.

Paul Bastick and Anne Chorley had agreed to stand again as Treasurer and Secretary.  The appointment of Paul Bastick was proposed by Kay Broadbent and seconded by Catherine Faulks.   The appointment of Anne Chorley was proposed by Peggy Post and seconded by Billie Lee.

The committee was re-elected en bloc for a further period of three years.

Kay Broadbent                             Tom Croft

Catherine Faulks                          Sandra Kamen

David Marshall                           Peter Mishcon

Jane Martineau                              Tony Temple

Peggy Post

Billie Lee had been co-opted onto the committee in 2021 and was due to be elected to the committee.  He was proposed by Peggy post and seconded by Catherine Faulks.

6. Any Other Business

Joanna Gardener proposed a vote of thanks to the Chairman which received a warm response, and there being no further business the Chairman closed the meeting.





Minutes of past annual general meetings

50th AGM: 16 July 2019

49th AGM: 18 July 2018

48th AGM: 27 July 2017

47th AGM: 13 July 2016

46th AGM: 15 July 2015

45th AGM: 2 July 2014

44th AGM: 3 July 2013

43rd AGM: 4 July 2012

42nd AGM: 6 July 2011

41st AGM: 6 July 2010

40th AGM: 7 July 2009

27th GM: 27 June 1995

26th AGM: 20 June 1994

25th AGM: 21 June 1993

24th AGM: 16 June 1992

23rd AGM: 8 June 1991

22nd AGM: 27 June 1990

21st AGM: 7 June 1989

20th AGM: 22 June 1988

19th AGM: 24 June 1987

18th AGM: 25 June 1986

17th AGM: 25 June 1985

16th AGM: 25 June 1984

15th AGM: 20 June 1983

14th AGM: 21 June 1982

3rd AGM: 15 July 1971

We do not have on our files the minutes of many of our earlier AGMs. If any members have kept them, we should be most grateful for copies.

Please contact editor@ladbroke

This page deals with standard applications from householders and commercial establishments. There are slightly different procedures and requirements for major developments.

The Council published a new guide in early 2020 on the various opportunities during the planning process for third parties to intervene in the development and consideration of planning applications, called Statement of Community Involvement. What follows is supplementary and more informal guidance.

Prior consultation

A good neighbour, if they are planning any works that are likely to affect adjoining or nearby properties will inform the occupants of the plans and allow them a chance to comment on them, well before seeking planning permission. The Council encourages such consultation (albeit not as strongly as we would like). If you hear about plans for works on a neighbouring property before planning permission has been applied for, it is worth asking for a meeting – either with the neighbour or with their architect – to discuss them.

All the evidence points to the whole operation going much more smoothly if advance consultation with neighbours has taken place. Even if the neighbour does not change his main plans, he may be able to adjust them in minor ways that help the occupants of the adjoining properties. Unfortunately, however, only too often there is no serious attempt at such consultation.

Pre-application advice

For anything at all complicated, the Council encourages anybody wanting planning permission to make use of their paid “Pre-application advice service”. This involves would-be applicants describing what they want to do to a Council planning officer. The latter then gives them advice on whether it is likely to be acceptable and if necessary what they can do to make their plans more likely to be accepted. Not everybody is happy with this system. There is concern that, if Council officers have given certain advice, this is bound to colour how they subsequently advise Councillors on the application. The Council are adamant, however, that nothing said in the pre-application advice will pre-judge the decision on any subsequent planning application.

There is no obligation on the planning officer giving the advice to consult neighbours. But here again, in cases where the planned development is likely to affect neighbours significantly, we hope that applicants will show the officer any comments from neighbours and allow neighbours to express their views to the officer.

The Council now makes available on its website any pre-application advice given as soon as the relevant application has been formally submitted. Pre-application advice has its own case number preffixed “AR”. It can be found on the website with the other documents relating to that application.

After submission of a planning application 

Once the Council receives a planning application, it sends letters to the occupiers of the immediately neighbouring properties, notifying them of the application and telling them how to comment. It also puts up “site notices” on or near the property – these are the plastic covered sheets that one sees attached to front gates or lamp-posts or some other handy feature. These letters and notices invite comments and say where comments should be sent and by what deadline.

It should be borne in mind that Councils normally allow only a very brief period – usually three weeks in Kensington and Chelsea – for comments. A trick by some less scrupulous developers is to apply for permission in holiday periods when residents of neighbouring buildings may be away. So if you have had a whiff of any plans for a potentially worrying development – e.g. a basement excavation – make arrangements (for instance with a neighbour who is not going on holiday) for someone to notify you if a Council letter about a planning application arrives, or any notices go up on nearby fences, lamp-posts or trees. In Kensington and Chelsea, it is also possible to subscribe to the Council’s MyRBKC email alert facility, which enables you to be kept informed by email of planning applications in a particular area (which could be a single street). See

Even if you only hear about the proposed works after the neighbour has applied for planning permission, if you see problems it is well worth making contact with them or their architects, to discuss with them whether there are any minor adjustments to the plans that might help avoid the problems. Reasonable developers are often prepared to make at least minor changes to accommodate their neighbours, even after the application has been put in, not least as it may help speed up the granting of planning permission as it reduces the likelihood of objections.

Many major developments are done by companies or people based off-shore, and there is no obvious interlocutor. In that case often the best thing will be to approach the architects responsible for the project (their details will be on the planning application). Most good architects will be happy to talk at least once to worried neighbours and to explain the plans to them. They will also be able to discuss alterations that might lessen any problems for the neighbours.

Looking at the planning application 

The site notices and letters give only the briefest details of what is planned, but the full application can be viewed on the planning pages of the Council website at Go to “Documents” for the papers about the proposal. The most useful document to start with is usually the “Design and Access” or Planning Statement, which gives an outline of the proposal.

When looking at the plans, bear in mind that architects can draw plans in a way that is difficult for the lay person to interpret, and their drawings (which may include wonderful computer-generated photograph-style colour images) often show the new structure from an angle that disguises objectionable features.

Each application has a “case officer” who is responsible for overseeing the progress of that particular application and whose name is on the Council website. The case officers always visit the site and can look at particular problems drawn to their attention. If you have serious concerns about an application, it may be worth making an appointment to talk them through with the case officer, or at any rate talking to the officer on the telephone.

Putting in an objection

There is a pro-forma on the Council website that can be used for putting in comments on or objections to an application, and that is what the Council prefer. It also ensures that your comment is put as soon as possible. But letters or emails  – – commenting on an application are also accepted and do not have to take any particular form, so long as they contain the name and address of the person making them, as well as the address of the site and the planning reference number.

All objections or other comments are put on the RBKC website with the other documents related to that application, so that everybody can see them. As a result of the General Data Protection Regulation, the Council no longer automatically publish the names and addresses of objectors on the website. This is a nuisance, as it makes it more difficult to judge how much weight to give to an objection (most people would give more weight to an objection from a nextdoor neighbour, for instance, than when it comes from someone living further away). Objectors are asked on the online form whether they agree to their address being published and we would urge people to give their agreement. If you are happy for your name to be published as well, you can say so as part of your objection.

If you use the online form, you will be asked to say whether your comment constitutes a general comment, an objection or a statement of support. If people are objecting to only a part of an application, they are often reluctant to classify it as an objection, not least because of wanting to maintain good relations with their neighbour. Please bear in mind, however, that only comments classified as objections will count towards the three-objection rule that may trigger a committee meeting (see below) and will be dealt with in the officers’ report.

The Council asks for objections to be submitted by a certain deadline (they normally allow 21 working days). It will still accept and take into consideration objections and comments after the deadline, but they will not count towards the three-objection rule.

In Kensington and Chelsea, if the application is obviously unacceptable or the Council receives fewer than three “valid” objections by the deadline, the matter does not normally go to the Planning Applications Committee but is decided by the Council staff under “delegated authority”. If an application is contentious, therefore, it is well worth encouraging neighbours similarly affected to send in their own objections, so that there are the necessary three objections to ensure that the matter is considered by the Committee. Note that a letter signed by several people counts as a single objection, so it is always best for each person to send in a separate objection.

Objections may also be ignored for the purposes of the three-objection rule if they are about something like noise that the officers are satisfied can be fixed by a planning condition (e.g. requiring noise levels to be kept below a certain level).

If not enough people have objected, it is also possible for one of the local Councillors to request that a case be dealt with by the Planning Applications Committee rather than a decision being taken by the Council officers.

Councils do not have a free hand in deciding on planning applications, as they are only entitled to take into account “material planning considerations”. An objection will only count as “valid” if it is based on a  “material planning consideration” –  i.e. something that could be dealt with under planning legislation and national or local planning policies. Thus an objection about the effects on the value of the neighbouring property will not be considered valid, as this is not something the planning system can take into account. As these include national or local planning policies, if you can show that a development would be contrary to one of these policies, that would be a strong objection. Councils are unfortunately not entitled to refuse planning permission on grounds of the inconvenience caused to neighbours during the construction, or because the development would affect property values, or on account of a problem that can be dealt with under other legislation, like the Building Regulations. More on material planning considerations and central and local planning policies..

So it is well worth looking at the Council’s planning policies, and making sure that your objections relate to these policies or to another material planning consideration.

It is best to keep objections as short and to the point as possible. The busy Councillors on the planning committee will read all the objections, but they are more likely to retain and be influenced by a few short, sharp points than by a long rambling screed which makes every conceivable point. And if there are things that you support about the application, say that too. It can show that you are a reasonable person who has thought about the issues and that you are not just being generally negative. Objections cast in angry or impolite language are less likely to be effective.

The number of objections can be less important than the quality. For instance, if there are a large number of identical objections which are clearly part of an organised campaign, these are likely to be less effective than fewer individual objections each explaining how the objector will be affected personally.

It is also worth remembering that it is not always necessary to get a planning application turned down; sometimes the required objective can be achieved by the imposition of conditions by the Council, and this may be easier to achieve. For instance, if there are concerns about privacy, a condition may be imposed requiring windows to have frosted glass; or if a potentially noisy air conditioning unit is being installed, a condition might require noise from the unit to be below existing background noise so that it does not disturb.

In some cases, especially if there have been a lot of strong objections, the applicant will withdraw his application and submit an amended one that he thinks is more likely to get through. It is important to note that, if you still object to what is proposed, you will need to put in a new objection to the amended application. The Council does not take account of the objections that were put in against the previous application, given the possibility that the earlier objectors may have moved or changed their views.

Normally, applications are decided on the basis of the plans and papers with which they are submitted, although the Council may accept insubstantial amendments or minor corrections during the application process – unfortunately, there is always a slight risk that what the Council officer regards as insubstantial may not appear in that light to a neighbour who is more familiar with the situation. Sometimes changes are proposed by the applicant to make the proposal more acceptable to the objectors. In such cases the Council may consult the objectors to see if the changes are sufficient to make them withdraw their objections.

The case officer’s report 

The next step is the preparation of a report by the planning case officer. This describes the application and any previous planning applications relating to the property; sets out how (in the opinion of the case officer) the proposed development does or does not fit in with Council planning policies; and summarises the objections received. It then addresses each objection, explaining – too often far too briefly and inadequately – why the officer believes particular objectives are unfounded, or have been addressed by changes in the proposals or by planning conditions. The report then makes a recommendation on whether the application should be accepted or not, and on any conditions to which it should be subject.

If there have been fewer that three valid objections, or if the officer recommends that the application should be refused, the report then normally goes to the Executive Director of Planning and Place (currently Amanda Reid). If she agrees with the recommendation, she will then take a decision on it under her delegated powers.

In cases of “delegated decisions”, the case officer’s report is not published until after the decision has been taken. For cases going to the Planning Applications Committee, the report is put on the Council website alongside the other documents relating to that application five working days before the Committee meeting at which it is to be considered.

In the latter case, if when you see the planning officer’s report you spot a genuine factual inaccuracy (i.e. as opposed to something you just disagree with), we recommend that you email the case officer as soon as possible to point it out, with a copy to the Chairman of the Planning Applications Committee..

Finding out about the date of the Planning Applications Committee and the documents that it will have before it 

The Planning Applications Committee normally meets every two or three weeks on a Tuesday evening. The dates of the meetings are set well in advance. But when a particular application will be considered by the Committee may not be known until shortly before the relevant meeting. The planning website gives a target date for decisions on individual applications, but these are no more than targets and often slip.

The Council notifies the applicant and objectors by letter the previous week when an application is being taken by Committee. If you have not given an email address, this will be by leyyer, so if you are away on holiday, make sure somebody picks up your post). For other people, the only way of discovering when an item is to be taken, short of ringing the case officer at intervals, is to check the agenda of each forthcoming Planning Committee, which is put online about a week beforehand. To look at Planning Applications Committee dates and agendas, go to the RBKC Home page and click on “Council, Councillors and Democracy”; then on “Councillors and Committee meetings”, then on “Committees, agendas and reports”; then on “Council Committees”; then on “Planning Applications Committee” (the “Planning Committee” is a separate body that deals only with major developments and policy matters). We have incidentally been urging the Council for some time to make it easier for people to get through to the right page.

Membership and procedure of the Planning Applications Committee 

The Planning Applications Committee has some 14 members, including a Chairman (currently Councillor James Husband) and one or more Vice-Chairmen who may sit in his stead. . Normally, however, no more than four members plus the Chairman or Vice-Chairmen sit at any one time. The names of those sitting are normally put on the website a few days before the Committee meets. The meetings take place in one of the Committee Rooms in the Town Hall and are open to the public. There are no copies of the agenda or any of the papers available to the public at the meeting, so you should print out from the website any papers you may need. Councillors on the committee will have a paper agenda including a full set of objections (except in the few cases where there are large numbers of objections all saying the same thing, when there will be a summary).

If the Committee takes a decision different to that recommended in the case officer’s report, the Chairman will normally spell out the reasons for doing so. If the Committee takes the decision recommended by the report, then the Chairman does not normally spell out the reasons in any detail, on the basis that these are already fully set out in the report.

Speaking at the Planning Applications Committee

If the matter goes to the Planning Applications Committee, people who have commented on the application, are allowed to speak at the meeting provided they register in advance. If an objector is speaking, the Chairman will also allow the applicant to speak. For objectors, it is worth attending a previous meeting of the committee to get a flavour of the proceedings.

The proceedings will begin with an description of the proposal (with graphics on a screen) by the planning officer. The Chairman then invites both the objectors and the applicants to the table, to address the meeting for a maximum of three minutes each so as to put their respective cases. Both objectors and applicants can choose to be represented by a professional adviser – e.g. an architect or planning consultant, although this is probably only necessary for objectors in really difficult cases (councillors can be more swayed heartfelt arguments put by the people directly affected). Since all objectors must share the same three minutes, if there is more than one objector, it is worth the objectors getting together and choosing a spokesperson, or deciding how the time should be divided between them. If two separate parties have agreed to share the time equally, we suggest they ask the chairman to say when the first speaker’s time is up, as it is only too easy to overrun.

Sometimes two objectors wish to speak on two completely separate aspects of an application – one may for instance be concerned about overlooking and loss of privacy; and another may be concerned that the development will take light from their property. We have argued in such cases that it is unfair to expect the two to have only one and a half minutes each to describe their concerns. In such cases, it may be worth emailing the chairman in advance of the meeting to ask whether he would be prepared exceptionally to allow extra time.

Applications to speak must be made by telephone two working days beforehand, i.e. by noon on the Friday before a Tuesday Committee meeting (instructions on registration are given in the letter or email notifying objectors of the meeting).  The Chairman is extremely strict about this deadline. The Committee does not allow speakers to raise new points or to circulate new documents. So if there is a new point that you want to raise (e.g. an inaccuracy in one of the documents), you should email the case officer and/or Chairman about it in advance. You can assume that the Councillors on the Committee will have read your written objection, so there is not an awful lot of point going through it again. Generally, it is most useful to use the three minutes to challenge anything that you feel that the case officer or the developer has misrepresented or got wrong, and to briefly restate your main concern. It may be useful, however, to email the Committee members in advance with a very brief account of your objection, although the Council does not encourage this.

Once both sides have spoken, members of the committee are invited by the chair to put any questions they may have. There is no limit on the time for this, so if there is a particularly complicated issue on which it is difficult to do justice, you can summaries it in your address to the committee and say you would be prepared to dilate on it in response to questions.

The Chair then invites the parties to go back to their seats and the committee proceeds to question the case officer and to discuss what their decision should be. We have argued that the parties should be allowed to remain at the table during that stage, as not infrequently new issues can come up on which it would make sense to question the paries, or somebody on the committee gets hold of the wrong end of the stick and it wouldmake sense for the parties to be able to correct them. This has not yet been agreed, however.

In RBKC, Councillors in the ward in which the development is planned also have a right to address the planning committee. If a sufficient number of residents approach their Councillor, or the application concerns something near to the Councillor’s heart, he or she may be prepared to speak on behalf of the objectors. So it is worth approaching your ward Councillors about a problematic application, to see if they would be prepared to speak. Their speaking time does not count against the three minutes allowed to objectors.

Councillors who are actually members of the Planning Applications Committee are required to keep an open mind before the meeting so that they can look at each application with suitable objectivity. So although objectors can approach them, they will not be able to take a view in advance of the meeting, and obviously cannot speak on behalf of one side or the other. The Chairman of the Committee often himself visits the sites of applications being dealt with by the Committee, as do some of the more conscientious members.

There is more useful advice from a planning QC on the Kensington Society’s website – see

Planning conditions and non-material amendments.

Almost all planning applications are granted subject to conditions, for instance that before they go ahead the applicant must submit a detailed design for some aspect of their proposal, or a full construction traffic management plan. When the applicant puts in the relevant documentation, the Council decides if it is satisfactory, and if it is, “discharges” the condition, after which the applicant can start the work. Applications for the discharge of conditions are added to the documents on website entry for that property, so they can be viewed by the public, and the Council will take account of any comments on them received from third parties. However, no notification is sent out to interested parties, so the only way of finding out about them is to constantly scan the planning website or to sign up to the “myRBKC” notification system. Applications for the discharge of conditions are prefaced by CON. It is particularly important for those affected by a major development to have a look at the final version of the contstruction traffic management plan (CTMP).

Applicants can also apply, after planning permission has been granted, to make “non-material amendments” to their planning permission. Again, these are put on the website and the Council will accept comments, but no notice is given to interested parties. There is no statutory definition of a non-material amendment, but it basically means some change so minor that it is unlikely to affect anybody or thing. It is up to the Council to decide whether or not the proposed amendment is non-material. Unfortunately, a change that appears non-material to a planning officer may be all too material to an unfortunate neighbour. So it is worth keeping an eye open for such amendments and this is a good reason for signing up to myRBKC. Applications for non-material amendments are prefaced by NMA.

Refusals and appeals 

There is no appeal against a decision by the Committee (or a delegated decision) to approve an application (short of full-blown judicial review, which will only succeed if the judge is persuaded that the decision is legally wrong or one that no reasonable planning committee could have taken). However, if an application is refused, either by delegated decision or at the Committee stage, the applicant has a right of appeal to the Government’s Planning Inspectorate. Applicants are particularly likely to appeal in cases where Councillors have gone against planning officers’ advice. Appeals must be made within six months of the refusal of planning permission.

Once the Inspectorate has received an appeal, it will send the Council an “Appeal Start Letter” setting out the timetable for dealing with the appeal. The Council will then put this on the RBKC website alongside the other documents relating to the case; and notify all those involved, including objectors. It will also send the Inspectorate all the documents, including the objections, so the Inspector dealing with the appeal will have full access to what the objectors have said.

If the application was made by a homeowner, no further comments can be submitted to the Inspector. For applications made by developers or investors, it is usually possible to put further written submissions and to speak at any hearing that is held by the Inspector.

If an application has been refused, the applicant may well put in an amended application which takes account of the Council’s objections. Sometimes, applicants will do this in parallel to appealing against the refusal of their original application, in order not to lose time should their appeal not be successful. If their new application is accepted and they are also successful at appeal, they will then have the choice of which application to implement. 

After planning permission has been granted

Once planning permission has been granted, the neighbour who made the application is free to start at any time, subject to the requirements of the Party Wall Act. He must, however, start the works within three years or the planning permission will lapse. He must also abide by any conditions that the Council has imposed as part of the grant of planning permission, and he is subject to Building Regulations and various other legislation e.g. on noise, pollution and traffic, including the Council’s excellent 2019 Code of Construction Practice.

The Council normally reminds successful applicants of the possible need for a party wall agreement with their neighbour. This is not, however, something that the Council can enforce or become involved in, as it is a civil matter.
Read more about party wall agreements.

If, after the applicant starts work, you believe that they are doing something beyond what was agreed when planning permission was granted, you should report it to the Council’s enforcement department. See further details. The Council does not reveal the names of those reporting possible breaches, so you can be assured of anonymity.

Page last updated 26.4.2020.

Forthcoming events